PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 3, 2025PeerJ2 citationsOpen Access

Predictive performance of clinical scores and survival outcomes in critically ill patients with sepsis: a prospective longitudinal study at a tertiary medical centre in Ethiopia

View Full Paper
GKGirum Tesfaye KiyaJimma UniversityZMZeleke MekonnenJimma UniversityEAElsah Tegene AsefaJimma University

Key Points

  • MEWS score showed good performance in identifying sepsis, detecting culture-positive cases, and predicting mortality.
  • In the ICU cohort, 148 patients had sepsis, with a notable 36.5% mortality rate among these individuals.
  • Cox proportional hazards model identified that increased Glasgow Coma Scale scores significantly reduce the hazard of death.
  • This study highlights the importance of using MEWS in ICUs to improve early identification and intervention in sepsis cases.

Abstract

Background Clinical scores such as quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA), early warning score (EWS), and universal vital assessment (UVA) are commonly used as screening and prognostic tools in sepsis. However, consistent findings across different regions and hospital settings remain limited. This study aims to evaluate the performance of these clinical scores and identify predictors of survival in septic adults admitted to the ICU. Methods A prospective longitudinal study was conducted from October 10, 2023, to October 9, 2024, involving adults admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Clinical scores were calculated on the first, third, and fifth days of admission. Their performance in detecting sepsis, identifying culture-positive cases, and predicting mortality was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to estimate survival probabilities, and a Cox proportional hazards model was applied to identify predictors of survival in sepsis patients. Results Of the ICU-admitted patients, 148 (51.9%) were septic, and 54 (36.5%) of them died in the ICU. The modified early warning score (MEWS) showed good performance in identifying sepsis (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61–0.73) and culture-positive cases (AUC = 0.65; 95% CI 0.50–0.80) on the day of admission. MEWS also performed better in predicting mortality on day five (AUC = 0.75; 95% CI 0.57–0.93). Patients with sepsis had significantly lower survival probabilities than those without sepsis (log-rank test, p < 0.001). Each additional point in the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score reduced the hazard of death by 10% (HR = 0.90; 95% CI 0.84–0.97; p = 0.005). Conclusion The MEWS score outperformed other clinical scores in identifying sepsis, detecting culture-positive cases, and predicting mortality. Sepsis was associated with higher mortality, which decreased with increasing GCS scores. MEWS may support early identification of sepsis and mortality risk, and its use could help improve ICU survival through timely intervention.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kiya et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e040f7a99c246f578b3ac8https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.20109
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Clinical Scores can predict mortality in septic patients in icu2024
  2. 2Development and validation of a community acquired sepsis-worsening score in the adult emergency department: a prospective cohort: the CASC score2024
  3. 3A simple electronic medical record-based predictors of illness severity in sepsis (sepsis) score2024
  4. 4Prognostic value of laboratory markers and clinical scores for mortality in intensive care unit patients with sepsis2025
  5. 5Prognostic value of laboratory markers and clinical scores for mortality in intensive care unit patients with sepsis2025 · 3 citations