PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 4, 2024Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2 citationsOpen Access

Mortality rate of percutaneous coronary interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients under the public health insurance schemes of Thailand

View Full Paper
SCSuppavit ChumsantivutSLSomrat LertmaharitTRThanapoom Rattananupong

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Background In Thailand, access to specific pharmaceuticals and medical devices for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients is restricted within certain healthcare systems, leading to inequalities in the quality of medical care among different healthcare systems. This study aims to compare mortality rates within one year of STEMI patients among the public health insurance schemes of Thailand. Methodology This study is a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). It involves patients utilizing various state health insurance schemes in Thailand from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020. Data collection occurred through the hospital's computerized management system and the registration administration office of the Department of Provincial Administration. Results The study involved 1,077 patients, categorized into three groups based on their state health insurance: Universal Health Coverage (UC) (546 patients, 50.7%), Social Security System (SS) (199 patients, 18.5%), and Civil Service Reimbursement (CS) (332 patients, 30.8%). The one-year mortality rates in these groups were 10.57%, 4.21%, and 6.47%, respectively ( p = 0.010). In the unadjusted model, the SS group showed a lower risk of one-year mortality Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.38, 95% CI 0.18–0.80, p = 0.011, and the CS group also demonstrated a lower risk (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35–0.99, p = 0.047) compared to the UC group. In the adjusted model, only the CS group significantly reduced the risk of one-year mortality. Other factors that affected one-year mortality were age ≥65 years, prior coronary artery diseases, Killip class 3–4, pre-discharge prescription of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, occlusion in the left anterior descending artery, multivessel disease, in-hospital atrial fibrillation/flutter and in-hospital pericardial effusion. Conclusion Healthcare schemes play a significant role in influencing one-year mortality rates among STEMI patients treated with pPCI. This information would be crucial for developing strategies and programs to aid healthcare policymakers at both regional and international levels in reducing morbidity and mortality.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chumsantivut et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e55da7e2b3180350efae5fhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1397015
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Predictors of 90-day outcome in patients stabilized after acute coronary syndromes2003 · 45 citations
  2. 2Impact of Diabetes on Mortality After the First Myocardial Infarction1998 · 671 citations
  3. 3Elevated low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol: An inverse marker of morbidity and mortality in patients with myocardial infarction2023 · 26 citations
  4. 4Patient Characteristics, Procedural Details, and Outcomes of Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Real-World Practice: Insights from Nationwide Thai PCI Registry2022 · 16 citations
  5. 52017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation2017 · 9,891 citations