PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 3, 2024International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems/International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering32 citationsOpen Access

A significant features vector for internet traffic classification based on multi-features selection techniques and ranker, voting filters

View Full Paper
AMAlhamza MuntherMAMosleh M. AbualhajAAAlabass Alalousi

Key Points

  • Improved anomaly detection accuracy was achieved using a multi-feature selection technique, enhancing real-time data handling.
  • The highest classifier accuracy reached 95.5% when using selected features, demonstrating the effectiveness of the approach.
  • Analysis utilized multiple classifiers—C4.5, Naive Bayes, and support vector machine—across ten diverse datasets with varied instance sizes ranging between 10,000 to 300,000 each to validate results and performance metrics for effective classification.

Abstract

The pursuit of effective models with high detection accuracy has sparked great interest in anomaly detection of internet traffic. The issue still lies in creating a trustworthy and effective anomaly detection system that can handle massive data volumes and patterns that change in real-time. The detection techniques used, especially the feature selection methods and machine learning algorithms, are crucial to the design of such a system. The fundamental difficulty in feature selection is selecting a smaller subset of features that are more related to the class but are less numerous. To reduce the dimensionality of the dataset, this research offered a multi-feature selection technique (MFST) using four filter techniques: fast correlation-based filter, significance feature evaluator, chi-square, and gain ratio. Each technique's output vector is put via ranker and Borda voting filters. The feature with the highest number of votes and rank values will be selected from the dataset. The performance of the given MFST framework was the best when compared to the four strategies listed above functioning alone; three different classifiers were employed to test the accuracy. C4.5, nave Bayes, and support vector machine. The experiment outcomes employed ten datasets of different sizes with 10,000-300,000 instances. Only 8 out of 248 characteristics were chosen, with classifiers percentages averaging 65%, 93.8%, and 95.5%.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Munther et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e55db1e2b3180350efb398https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v14i6.pp6958-6968
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Performance Analysis of Random Forest Algorithm for Network Anomaly Detection using Feature Selection2024 · 6 citations
  2. 2Study on the impact of feature selection methods on the performance of machine learning models in cyberattack detection2025
  3. 3A Hybrid Binary and Multi-Class Classification Model for Network Intrusion Detection2026
  4. 4Extraction of Minimal Set of Traffic Features Using Ensemble of Classifiers and Rank Aggregation for Network Intrusion Detection Systems2024 · 4 citations
  5. 5Reviewing various feature selection techniques in machine learning‐based botnet detection2024 · 11 citations