PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 30, 2024Trusts & Trustees0 citations

The appointment of trustees, disclaimer of gifts and legal personality: fundamental principles and conceptual limits

View Full Paper
XWXavier P WalshDCDaniel B Cordeschi

Key Points

  • The court's jurisdiction to appoint trustees impacts how property is managed and upheld within trust law.
  • A critical inquiry is whether a trustee can disclaim a gift while simultaneously seeking appointment over the property.
  • Analyses focus on the legal personality of trustees and their ability to hold property for themselves or others, revealing complex interactions in trust management.  This investigation adopts insights from the case of Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd v University of New South Wales, providing clarity on these intricate legal principles.

Abstract

Abstract What happens when an executor of a Will is gifted property under that Will in its capacity as trustee of an existing trust but later disclaims the gift in that capacity? What purpose is served by the executor then seeking to be appointed by the Court as trustee over the same property? These questions were presented by the unique facts in Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd v University of New South Wales 2023 NSWSC 1061. This article uses the facts and decision in Perpetual to explore fundamental principles and conceptual limits concerning: the Court’s jurisdiction(s) to appoint trustees; the proposition that a trustee can(not) hold property on trust for itself; and the disclaimer of gifts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Walsh et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e56f6bb6db64358750fb17https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttae079
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Trustees’ Indemnities and Fiduciary Duties: The High Court Appeal in Naaman v Jaken Properties Australia Pty Ltd2024
  2. 2Changing of the guard: the delicate jurisdiction of trustee removal and the balance of power2024
  3. 3Vesting of property in personal representatives and trustees compared: the core distinction, its doctrinal justification, and practical consequences2026
  4. 4Cooper and Legler— deciphering the New Zealand Supreme Court’s message to trustees2025
  5. 5An unorthodox person—New Zealand Court of Appeal holds that a trust can be a person: RH & JY Trust v WorkSafe New Zealand [2026] NZCA 122026