PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 27, 2024Applied and Computational Engineering3 citations

A comparative study between WGAN-GP and WGAN-CP for image generation

View Full Paper
JGJiajun Gao

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Image generation allows the creation of visual content in a convenient manner. It is critical for enhancing digital experiences, from video games to virtual reality, enabling more engaging and immersive experiences. In current technologies, Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have achieved significant success but face challenges like training instability and mode collapse. By utilizing the Wasserstein distance, Wasserstein GAN (WGAN) enhances conventional GANs; however, its weight clipping method may not be ideal. In this study, WGAN with gradient penalty (WGAN-GP) and WGAN with weight clipping (WGAN-CP) are compared, which aims to enhance stability by better enforcing the Lipschitz constraint. For comparison, these approaches are validated using Fashion Modified National Institute of Standards and Technology (MNIST) and Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR)-10 datasets. Experimental results show WGAN-GP produces higher quality images and more stable training than WGAN-CP. However, WGAN-GP also requires longer training times and computational burden. The findings highlight a trade-off between training efficiency and output quality, guiding the choice of technique based on specific application needs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jiajun Gao (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e572cdb6db6435875133efhttps://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/83/2024glg0059
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper