PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 20, 2024BMC Medicine8 citationsOpen Access

Socioeconomic and ethnic disparities in preterm births in an English maternity setting: a population-based study of 1.3 million births

View Full Paper
GKGbenga A KayodeAHA HowellCBChristy Burden

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Background Preterm birth is a major cause of infant mortality and morbidity and accounts for 7–8% of births in the UK. It is more common in women from socially deprived areas and from minority ethnic groups, but the reasons for this disparity are poorly understood. To inform interventions to improve child survival and their quality of life, this study examined the socioeconomic and ethnic inequalities in preterm births (< 37 weeks of gestation at birth) within Health Trusts in England. Methods This study investigated socioeconomic and ethnic inequalities in preterm birth rates across the National Health Service (NHS) in England. The NHS in England can be split into different units known as Trusts. We visualised between-Trust differences in preterm birth rates. Health Trusts were classified into five groups based on their standard deviation (SD) variation from the average national preterm birth rate. We used modified Poisson regression to compute risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) with generalised estimating equations. Results The preterm birth rate ranged from 6.8/100 births for women living in the least deprived areas to 8.8/100 births for those living in the most deprived areas. Similarly, the preterm birth rate ranged from 7.8/100 births for white women, up to 8.6/100 births for black women. Some Health Trusts had lower than average preterm birth rates in white women whilst concurrently having higher than average preterm birth rates in black and Asian women. The risk of preterm birth was higher for women living in the most deprived areas and ethnicity (Asian). Conclusions There was evidence of variation in rates of preterm birth by ethnic group, with some Trusts reporting below average rates in white ethnic groups whilst concurrently reporting well above average rates for women from Asian or black ethnic groups. The risk of preterm birth varied substantially at the intersectionality of maternal ethnicity and the level of socioeconomic deprivation of their residency. In the absence of other explanations, these findings suggest that even within the same Health Trust, maternity care may vary depending on the women’s ethnicity and/or whether she lives in an area of high socioeconomic deprivation. Thus, social factors are likely key determinants of inequality in preterm birth rather than provision of maternity care alone.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kayode et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e57c24b6db64358751b8b2https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03493-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Inequalities in Preterm Birth in England: A Retrospective National Cohort Study Focusing on Deprivation and Ethnicity, Using Routinely Collected Maternity Hospital Data2025
  2. 26262 Intersecting ethnic and socio-economic inequalities in infant mortality in England using office of national statistics (ONS) data, 2007–20192024
  3. 3Comment on “Inequalities in Neonatal Unit Mortality in England and Wales Between 2012 and 2022: A Retrospective Cohort Study”2026
  4. 4The Role of Ethnicity and Migration in Perinatal Inequalities: A Retrospective Cohort Study2026 · 2 citations
  5. 5Race and Ethnicity, Deprivation, and Infant Mortality in England, 2019-20222024 · 20 citations