PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 7, 20251 citationsOpen Access

Implementation of Primary and Secondary Ice Production in EC-Earth3-AerChem: Global Impacts and Insights

View Full Paper
MCMontserrat Costa-SurósMAMaría Gonçalves AgeitosMCMarios Chatziparaschos

Key Points

  • The new aerosol-sensitive primary ice production scheme enhances ice crystal number concentrations and cloud cover.
  • Incorporating secondary ice production reduces cloud radiative effect biases at mid- and high latitudes while increasing them in lower latitudes.
  • The configuration improves alignment with global ice nucleating particle observations, showing realistic spatial patterns.
  • This research highlights the necessity of both aerosol-sensitive nucleation and secondary ice production for accurate mixed-phase cloud simulations.

Abstract

Abstract. Clouds and aerosol–cloud interactions remain major sources of uncertainty in climate projections. We improve the representation of mixed-phase clouds (MPCs) in the EC-Earth3-AerChem Earth System Model by replacing the default temperature-dependent nucleation scheme with a physically based aerosol-sensitive heterogeneous ice nucleation parameterization. This scheme accounts for immersion freezing by K-feldspar, quartz, and marine organic aerosols, and is combined with a machine-learning-based parameterization of secondary ice production (SIP) to represent ice crystal multiplication. The new configuration improves agreement with global in situ ice nucleating particle (INP) observations and reveals realistic spatial patterns of ice crystal number concentrations (ICNC). While biases in liquid water path persist, with overestimations in the tropics and underestimations at high latitudes, the aerosol-sensitive primary ice production scheme increases supercooled liquid water and cloud cover, particularly in the extratropics. Critically, the addition of SIP rebalances the cloud phase by enhancing ICNC in regions with low primary ice formation. Compared to the default scheme, the aerosol-sensitive primary ice production configuration with SIP reduces cloud radiative effect biases at mid- and high latitudes, while increasing them in the lower latitudes, leading to comparable global biases across configurations. Our results highlight the importance of explicitly representing both aerosol-sensitive nucleation and SIP for realistic simulations of MPCs and their radiative impacts. Unlike previous schemes, in which ice concentrations depend directly on INPs, the presence of effective SIP enhances ice formation in all MPCs and reduces the sensitivity of ICNC to aerosols, especially at low INP levels.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Costa-Surós et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e585d0b1e78cc4e5f4654dhttps://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4659
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Implementation of primary and secondary ice production in EC-Earth3-AerChem: global impacts and insights2026
  2. 2Prognostic simulations of mixed-phase clouds with model AC-1D v1.0: the impact of aerosol types and freezing parameterizations on ice crystal budgets2026
  3. 3Sensitivity of Arctic Clouds to Ice Microphysical Processes in the NorESM2 Climate Model2024 · 9 citations
  4. 4Assessing the global contribution of marine, terrestrial bioaerosols, and desert dust to ice-nucleating particle concentrations2024 · 6 citations
  5. 5Modelling secondary ice production in Arctic mixed-phase clouds2024