PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 14, 2024Advances and Applications in Statistics0 citations

Comparing Poisson Rates When Data Are Subject to Underreporting

View Full Paper
JSJames D. StameyBaylor University

Key Points

  • Underreporting compromises the statistical power of the conditional test when comparing Poisson rates under a standard binomial assumption.
  • Theoretical model development yields a large sample normal test alongside a parametric bootstrap test, correcting for missing counts using a double sample.
  • These corrected testing procedures maintain inferential validity across count data, though application remains constrained by the accuracy of the double sample.

Abstract

Count data are often modeled with the Poisson distribution. Comparison of two Poisson rates can be done using the conditional test based on the binomial assumption. When the counts are underreported, the power of the conditional test can be impacted. We propose a large sample normal test and a small sample parametric bootstrap test based on estimators corrected for underreporting via a double sample. An example is given.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

James D. Stamey (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5891fb6db643587524f82https://doi.org/10.17654/0972361724071
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper