PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 9, 2024Conservation Biology4 citationsOpen Access

Navigating ethical challenges in online wildlife trade research

View Full Paper
TMThaís Q. MorcattySSShan SuPSPenthai Siriwat

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract The surge in internet accessibility has transformed wildlife trade by facilitating the acquisition of wildlife through online platforms. This scenario presents unique ethical challenges for researchers, as traditional ethical frameworks for in‐person research cannot be readily applied to the online realm. Currently, there is a lack of clearly defined guidelines for appropriate ethical procedures when conducting online wildlife trade (OWT) research. In response to this, we consulted the scientific literature on ethical considerations in online research and examined existing guidelines established by professional societies and ethical boards. Based on these documents, we present a set of recommendations that can inform the development of ethically responsible OWT research. Key ethical challenges in designing and executing OWT research include the violation of privacy rights, defining subjects and illegality, and the risk of misinterpretation or posing risks to participants when sharing data. Potential solutions include considering participants’ expectations of privacy, defining when participants are authors versus subjects, understanding the legal and cultural context, minimizing data collection, ensuring anonymization, and removing metadata. Best practices also involve being culturally sensitive when analyzing and reporting findings. Adhering to these guidelines can help mitigate potential pitfalls and provides valuable insights to editors, researchers, and ethical review boards, enabling them to conduct scientifically rigorous and ethically responsible OWT research to advance this growing field.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Morcatty et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e58feab6db64358752b3aehttps://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14341
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Wildlife Product Trading in Online Social Networks: A Case Study on Ivory-Related Product Sales Promotion Posts2024
  2. 2A Gap in Enforcement? Analysing the Legality and Effectiveness of Online Trade in Exotic Birds2024
  3. 3Urgent actions needed by digital services platforms to help achieve conservation and public health goals2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4Wildlife representation in social media: An ethical analysis of the 2025 influencer‐wombat encounter and implications for professionals involved in wildlife handling and care2025 · 1 citations
  5. 5An Examination of the Ways in Which Transdisciplinary Research Could Be Used to Incentivize Local Communities to Combat the Illegal Wildlife Trade2024 · 2 citations