PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 6, 2024Pacific Accounting Review3 citations

Earnings management, key audit matters and audit report readability

View Full Paper
TCTsung-Kang ChenYHYu-Shun HungYTYijie Tseng

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Purpose According to the management obfuscation hypothesis, managers have incentives to influence the audit reports’ communicative value. This study aims to examine the relationship between corporate earnings management and the readability of Chinese-text audit reports and the impact of key audit matter (KAM) disclosure requirements on this relationship. Design/methodology/approach This research adopts Taiwanese firms from 2010 to 2019 to investigate the association between earnings management and readability of Chinese-text audit reports within the framework of the KAM disclosure requirements implemented in 2016. Findings The findings show that auditors tend to issue less readable audit reports to firms undertaking earnings management, particularly after introducing KAM disclosures. Additional analyses indicate that such adverse impacts of client earnings management on audit report readability have become more pronounced for firms audited by a newly pointed or long-tenure lead audit partner, with high business risk, poor monitoring of governance mechanisms or a large amount of nonaudit services. These results suggest that auditor partners may compromise auditor independence and use flexible narratives in audit reports as a form of moral insurance. Practical implications As auditors may manage audit report readability to reduce audit liability, authorities must formulate policies concerning audit report disclosure to strengthen its communicative value and simplify language usage. Additionally, authorities should strengthen quality control standards concerning auditor independence to reduce auditor pressure from clients’ economic importance. Originality/value This study provides valuable insights into auditors' responses to corporate earnings management behavior, particularly regarding the interplay between earnings management, audit report quality and regulatory changes, thus expanding our understanding of the dynamics within the auditing profession.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5920cb6db64358752dad6https://doi.org/10.1108/par-12-2023-0169
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Financial report readability and audit fees: Evidence from China2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2Earnings management reactions to key audit matters2024
  3. 3Key Audit Matters, Readability and Greenwashing Effect: An Exploration from Indonesia and Malaysia2026
  4. 4Key audit matters’ tone and audit opinions: genuine or strategic disclosure2025
  5. 5THE RELATIONSHIP OF AUDIT FIRMS’ ATTRIBUTES AND THE READABILITY OF KEY AUDIT MATTERS WITH AUDITEES’ CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AS A MEDIATING FACTOR2025