PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 6, 2024African Journal of Urology1 citationsOpen Access

Predictors of outcomes in conservative management of high-grade renal trauma

View Full Paper
KSK. R. SuragKGKasi Viswanath GaliASAbhijit Shah

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Background Management of high-grade renal trauma is debatable, with the recent evidence embracing a conservative approach in the management of even grade 5 renal injuries. The study aimed to analyze the clinical profile of patients with high-grade renal trauma, assessing their management strategies, outcomes, complications, and need for ancillary procedures. Methods A retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained data was performed involving blunt abdominal trauma patients with high-grade renal injuries (Grade 4 and 5) presenting to our hospital from January 2018 to December 2022. Patient data analyzed included demographics, clinical presentation, injury characteristics, complications, ancillary procedures, and mortality rates. All patients underwent renal functional assessment using an isotope renogram scan at the 3-month follow-up. Data collected were entered into a database and subjected to descriptive analysis using Jamovi version 2.3.28. Results The study included 45 patients with a mean age of 29 years and a male-to-female ratio of 41:4. Most patients ( n = 42) were managed conservatively. Thirty-eight patients had grade 4 injuries, and seven had grade 5 injuries. Twenty-six patients suffered renal parenchymal injuries alone, three patients had renal vascular injuries alone, and 16 patients had both parenchymal and vascular injuries. Grade 5 renal injury ( p < 0.001), vascular high-grade injury ( p < 0.001), angioembolization ( p < 0.001), and blood transfusions ( p = 0.021) were significantly associated with the incidence of poorly functioning kidney in high-grade renal trauma patients managed conservatively. Multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed angioembolization ( p < 0.001), poorly functioning kidney post-trauma ( p < 0.001), and blood transfusions ( p < 0.001) were significantly associated with high-grade renal vascular injuries compared to high-grade renal parenchymal injuries. Conclusion Conservative management is advisable for high-grade renal trauma in hemodynamically stable patients. High-grade vascular injuries are more severe than parenchymal injuries and correlate with poorer renal functional outcomes. Grade 5 renal injury, predominantly vascular high-grade injury, and the requirement for angioembolization and blood transfusions serve as significant predictors of poorly functioning kidneys post-trauma. Urologists should consider these predictors when counseling patients regarding potential outcomes following conservative management of high-grade renal trauma.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Surag et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5931ab6db64358752dfe5https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-024-00448-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1TO EVALUATE THE PREDICTORS OF DELAYED NEPHRECTOMY IN HIGH GRADE BLUNT RENAL TRAUMA PATIENTS TREATED PRIMARILY WITH CONSERVATIVE LINE OF MANAGEMENT2024
  2. 2Management of grade IV pediatric blunt renal trauma: Conservative, interventional or surgical? Our experience between 2013 and 2020.2026
  3. 3Minimal invasive management for untreated high-grade renal trauma and its complication: A case report2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4Predictors of nephrectomy in high-grade renal trauma patients treated primarily with conservative intent2024
  5. 5GRADE 5 RENAL TRAUMA IN A 21-YEAR OLD MALE, MANAGED CONSERVATIVELY2024