PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 6, 2024Gosudarstvo i pravo0 citations

On current problems of the mechanism of liability of judges for disciplinary misconduct: Law enforcement practice, general approaches Part 3. On disciplinary liability of retired judges

View Full Paper
MKMikhail I. Kleandrov

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In the present article, the third in the series devoted to a perspective of disciplinary responsibility of judges features of the mechanism of disciplinary responsibility of the judges staying in resignation are considered. Two groups of the judges staying in resignation are considered: a) “vacationers” as pensioners or working in the positions permitted by the law; b) called according to the legislation for direct implementation of justice for a certain term. The author pays attention that disciplinary this type of responsibility of judges-retirees is conditional, in the law it is not called in any way, for violation set the bans and restrictions for the judges staying in resignation the only type of responsibility – the resignation termination is established that does not give the chance for perfect offense to apply adequate punishment. The author formulates the conclusions, proposals are made.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mikhail I. Kleandrov (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e59320b6db64358752e282https://doi.org/10.31857/s1026945224060043
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper