PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 2024Journal of Animal Science0 citations

PSLBII-28 Effects of dietary protein manipulation on greenhouse gases and ammonia emissions from feedlot beef steers

View Full Paper
STSebastian E Mejia TurciosSASharissa AndersonMKMathew Klein

Key Points

  • Balancing rumen available protein to microbial crude protein ratios reduced cumulative ammonia and sulfur dioxide gas emissions without impairing steer growth performance.
  • Steers fed excess protein emitted 52% more ammonia and 44% more sulfur dioxide than protein-deficient cattle, while balanced diets decreased methane production by up to 20%.
  • A randomized incomplete block design assessed 112 Black Angus steers in pen enclosures over two 42-day periods, demonstrating viable dietary strategies to curb feedlot air pollution.

Abstract

Abstract Black Angus steers n = 112; body weight (BW) = 401 ± 3.6 kg were used in a randomized incomplete block design to evaluate the effects of 3 rumen available protein to microbial crude protein ratios (RAP:MCP) on growth performance, and gaseous emissions from feedlot steers. Steers were blocked by initial BW and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment rations. Diets were fed rations either Deficient (-150 gּ animal-1ּ d-1; DEF), Balanced (0 gּ animal-1ּ d-1; BAL), or Excess (+150 gּ animal-1ּ d-1; EXS) in RAP: MCP. Steers were allocated and housed in cattle pen enclosures (CPE), and treatment diets were delivered daily as a total mixed ration. The present study consisted of two 42-d periods. Refusals were collected weekly and BW every 14 d. Gas measurements were obtained daily in sequential order from all CPE. Data were analyzed with R statistical software (4.2.3). The linear mixed effect model procedure within the “lme4” package was used with CPE as the experimental unit, treatment and week as fixed effects, and block and period as random effects. A contrast coefficient matrix was constructed to test for linear and quadratic effects. Initial, intermediary and final BW were not different for steers receiving the varying RAP:MCP (P ≥ 0.239). A treatment effect (P = 0.004) was observed for mean dry matter intake (DMI) where EXS steers consumed 0.46 kg more DM compared with BAL steers, but DEF steers had similar DMI to those fed EXS and BAL (P = 0.189). Average daily gain (ADG) was only affected by treatment (P = 0.007) on d 0 to 14 where steers receiving DEF gained 0.6 kg more than those fed BAL (P = 0.010), but those fed EXS had similar ADG. Similar to ADG, gain to feed (G:F) was affected by treatment (P = 0.012) only during d 0 to 14. Mean CH4 production from steers fed DEF and EXS were 20% and 13% greater (P = 0.010) compared with those fed BAL, respectively; however, CH4 from EXS vs. DEF steers was not different (P = 0.149). Mean cumulative NH3 emissions increased linearly by treatment with EXS steers emitting up to 52% more NH3 compared with those receiving DEF (P 0.001). Similarly, EXS steers had increased SO2 emissions by up to 44% compared with those fed DEF (P 0.001). Emissions of CO2, N2O, and H2S were similar (P 0.100). The manipulation of RAP:MCP in the diets of feedlot steers can drastically reduce NH3 emissions without affecting growth performance and may be a valuable tool to reduce air pollution from beef production systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Turcios et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e59fa4b6db643587539ec2https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae234.753
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper