PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 31, 2024Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders9 citationsOpen Access

Measuring Public Attitudes Toward Stuttering: Test-retest Reliability Revisited

View Full Paper
KLKenneth O. St. LouisEAElizabeth AlivetoMSMohyeddin Teimouri Sangani

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Purpose: Previous studies of the Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes-Stuttering (POSHA-S), using test and retest designs in modest-sized samples, have reported satisfactory test-retest reliability, i.e., correlations of about 0.80. Simultaneously, lower but moderate correlations between different first and second test respondents were observed and hypothesized to represent unspecified “societal” influences on stuttering attitudes. This study sought to clarify this and other potential relationships between first and second tests with the POSHA-S in a large, geographically and linguistically diverse sample.Methods: POSHA-S Overall Stuttering Scores (OSSs) of 345 respondents from 12 test-retest samples from four countries and languages, with no intervening interventions, were analyzed with correlations and by grouping respondents according to whose stuttering attitudes improved, remained the same, or worsened from test to retest.Results: Test and retest OSSs generally conformed to normal distributions and were not significantly different. Correlations between first versus second tests replicated earlier research. However, when the degree and direction of change from test to retest was considered, both in other correlations and in sorts of respondents, unexpected results emerged. Respondents with intermediate attitudes changed minimally, while those with most and least positive attitudes at the first test changed in opposite directions past the overall mean at second test.Conclusions: While demonstrating adequate test-retest reliability correlations on the POSHA-S, public attitudes were found to be less stable than previously assumed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Louis et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5a17bb6db64358753b99ehttps://doi.org/10.21849/cacd.2023.01081
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Improving Polish Stuttering Attitudes: An Experimental Study of Teachers and University Students2018 · 30 citations
  2. 2Impacts of adaptation and responsibility framings on attitudes towards climate change mitigation2016 · 64 citations
  3. 3Anticipated Group Interaction: Coping with Valence Asymmetries in Attitude Shift2007 · 33 citations
  4. 4Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it2004 · 1,967 citations
  5. 5Perspective Taking and Self-Persuasion: Why “Putting Yourself in Their Shoes” Reduces Openness to Attitude Change2019 · 44 citations