PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 30, 2024BJPsych Advances0 citations

Deprivation of liberty in hospital: the MHA versus DoLS dilemma

View Full Paper
JCJeremy CaveAKAlex Ruck KeeneMLMatthew Lowe

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

SUMMARY When admitting patients to hospital and treating them, psychiatrists and other health professionals may need to deprive them of their liberty. Where this occurs, professionals will need to work within a statutory framework to practice legally and protect their patients’ right to liberty under Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Within England and Wales, some clinical scenarios will require a choice to be made between the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA) and the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and its Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). This choice can be complex, is often overlooked and frequently misunderstood in clinical practice. Deciding between the two frameworks must be done on a case-specific basis. With the use of code of practice guidelines, case law and an unfolding clinical scenario we aim in this article to support clinicians in taking a clear-sighted approach to the dilemma and the factors to consider when deciding between the two regimes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cave et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5a4ccb6db64358753f012https://doi.org/10.1192/bja.2024.35
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper