PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 28, 2024Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering1 citationsOpen Access

Statistical analysis of adhesive rod-tube joints under tensile stress for structural applications

View Full Paper
AVA. J. A. VieiraRCR.D.S.G. CampilhoKMK. Madani

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Adhesive bonding has been replacing traditional joining methods such as welding, bolting, and riveting in the design of mechanical structures in the automotive, aerospace and aeronautic industries. This joining method has several advantages over traditional methods such as ease of manufacture, lower costs, ease of joining different materials, higher fatigue resistance, and high corrosion resistance. Although tubular adhesive joints have varying applications, such as in truss structures and vehicles, machine axles, and piping, different joint configurations exist, such as rod-tube joints (RTJ), which are not conveniently addressed in the literature. This work compares the tensile performance of adhesively bonded RTJ between aluminium alloy components (AW6082-T651), considering the variation of the main geometric parameters: overlap length ( L O ), tube thickness ( t S ), rod diameter ( d ), adhesive fillet angle ( f ), and type of adhesive. The Taguchi’s method was employed in the elaboration of the applied design of experiments (DoE). To compare the RTJ behaviour, a numerical analysis was carried out through finite element analysis (FEA) and cohesive zone modelling (CZM). Peel ( σ y ) and shear ( τ xy ) stresses in the adhesive layer were initially obtained by applying purely elastic models. CZM modelling made possible to obtain the damage evolution in the adhesive layer, the maximum load ( P m ) and dissipated energy ( U ) at P m of the adhesive joints. As a result of applying the Taguchi method, the adhesive joint that showed the best overall performance used the adhesive Araldite ® AV138, L O = 40 mm, d = 20, and t S = 3 mm.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vieira et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5a950b6db64358754339dhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-024-05146-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Numerical Evaluation of Hydroformed Tubular Adhesive Joints under Tensile Loads2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Multiaxial Fatigue Life Evaluation of Tubular Adhesively Bonded Joints1995
  3. 3Multiaxial stress effects on bonding strength in adhesively bonded joints2024 · 8 citations
  4. 4Mechanical Behavior of Adhesively Bonded Joints Under Tensile Loading: A Synthetic Review of Configurations, Modeling, and Design Considerations2025 · 18 citations
  5. 5Mechanical behavior of resistance spot welded, adhesive bonded, and hybrid joined AA51822026