PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 26, 2024Principia an international journal of epistemology0 citationsOpen Access

A Contextual Account of Explanation in Logic

View Full Paper
EEEvelyn Erickson

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Recent approaches to the epistemology of logic, under the title of “anti-exceptionalism about logic”, explicitly adopt what is asserted to be the method of theory choice and the correct account of explanation in the sciences. Without embracing such a doctrine, but still keeping within a broad anti-exceptional trend, the current discussion proposes a contextual theory of explanation in logic, based on Bas van Fraassen’s framework of why-questions, which neither claims that logic is a science, nor relies on the metaphysical assumption of a validity-phenomenon to give account of the methodology of logic.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Evelyn Erickson (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5aefbb6db643587548510https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2024.e98374
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1(Conceptual) explanations in logic2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2Anti‐Exceptionalism about Logic (Part I): From Naturalism to Anti‐Exceptionalism2024 · 5 citations
  3. 3Logical exceptionalism: Development and predicaments2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4Ontic or epistemic conception of explanation: A misleading distinction?2024
  5. 5Explanation, representation and information2024