PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 24, 20241 citationsOpen Access

Budgeted Multi-Armed Bandits with Asymmetric Confidence Intervals

View Full Paper
MHMarco HeydenVAVadim ArzamasovEFEdouard Fouché

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We study the stochastic Budgeted Multi-Armed Bandit (MAB) problem, where a player chooses from K arms with unknown expected rewards and costs. The goal is to maximize the total reward under a budget constraint. A player thus seeks to choose the arm with the highest reward-cost ratio as often as possible. Current approaches for this problem have several issues, which we illustrate. To overcome them, we propose a new upper confidence bound (UCB) sampling policy, ømega-UCB, that uses asymmetric confidence intervals. These intervals scale with the distance between the sample mean and the bounds of a random variable, yielding a more accurate and tight estimation of the reward-cost ratio compared to our competitors. We show that our approach has sublinear instance-dependent regret in general and logarithmic regret for parameter ρ ≥ 1, and that it outperforms existing policies consistently in synthetic and real settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Heyden et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5b139b6db64358754a522https://doi.org/10.1145/3637528.3671833
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A game theoretic formulation of the service provisioning problem in cloud systems2011 · 153 citations
  2. 2Finite-time Analysis of the Multiarmed Bandit Problem2002 · 5,934 citations
  3. 3Learning to Control Renewal Processes with Bandit Feedback2019 · 9 citations
  4. 4A Better Bound on the Variance2000 · 226 citations
  5. 5On the Likelihood that One Unknown Probability Exceeds Another in View of the Evidence of Two Samples1933 · 838 citations