PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 22, 2024Physica Scripta2 citations

Early and Late Observational Tension: Dark Energy Parametrizations in Horava-Lifshitz Gravity via Baryon Acoustic Oscillations

View Full Paper
HCHimanshu ChaudharyKhazar UniversityUDUjjal DebnathInstitute of Engineering ScienceFRFarook RahamanJadavpur University

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract We investigate late-time cosmic expansion within the Horava Lifshitz gravity framework using Barboza Alcaniz (BA) and Jassal Bagla Padmanabhan Parametrizations (JBP) as alternatives to general relativity. Anisotropic scaling is introduced at ultraviolet scales. Our aim is to constrain each cosmological parameter using the crucial Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) scale, specifically the sound horizon ( r d ), by treating ( r d ) as a free parameter. We employ 30 Hubble parameter measurements ( H ( z )) from cosmic chronometers, along with Type Ia Supernovae, Gamma-Ray Bursts, Quasars, and 24 uncorrelated BAO measurements spanning z = 0.106 to z = 2.33. The analysis includes the 2022 Hubble constant measurement by Riess (R22) as an additional prior and aims to minimize errors by simulating random correlations in the covariance matrix. In both the BA and JBP frameworks, utilizing the full dataset yields sound horizon results of r d = 146.5399 ± 2.4519 Mpc and r d = 146.4533 ± 2.4519 Mpc, respectively. When incorporating R22 results, the sound horizon values become r d = 143.4721 ± 1.8324 Mpc and r d = 142.9826 ± 1.9084 Mpc. These findings reveal a discrepancy between early and late observations, echoing the H 0 tension. Notably, excluding R22 aligns r d with Planck and SDSS results. Model predictions are evaluated against Hubble Measurements and the ΛCDM Paradigm. A comparative study between BA and JBP Models using the Cosmography test shows both models fitting seamlessly within the phantom region. Statistical analysis suggests neither model can be ruled out based on the latest observational measurements.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chaudhary et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5b4efb6db64358754df97https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad7178
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cosmological test of dark energy parametrizations within the framework of Horava-Lifshitz gravity using via Baryon Acoustic Oscillation2024
  2. 2Investigating $\omega(z)$ Parametrizations in Horava-Lifshitz Gravity: Observational Constraints with Covariance Matrix Simulation2024
  3. 32D BAO vs 3D BAO: solving the Hubble tension with alternative cosmological models2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4Testing the consistency of early and late cosmological parameters with BAO and CMB data2024 · 8 citations
  5. 5Observational Constraints on the Parameters of Hořava–Lifshitz Gravity2024 · 1 citations