PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 22, 2024Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology0 citations

EXPRESS: Prior multisensory learning can facilitate auditory-only voice-identity and speech recognition in noise

View Full Paper
CMCorrina MaguinnessSSSonja SchallBMBrian Mathias

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Seeing the visual articulatory movements of a speaker, while hearing their voice, helps with understanding what is said. This multisensory enhancement is particularly evident in noisy listening conditions. Multisensory enhancement also occurs even in auditory-only conditions: auditory-only speech and voice-identity recognition are superior for speakers previously learned with their face, compared to control learning; an effect termed the "face-benefit." Whether the face-benefit can assist in maintaining robust perception in increasingly noisy listening conditions, similar to concurrent multisensory input, is unknown. Here, in two behavioural experiments, we examined this hypothesis. In each experiment, participants learned a series of speakers' voices together with their dynamic face or control image. Following learning, participants listened to auditory-only sentences spoken by the same speakers and recognised the content of the sentences (speech recognition, Experiment 1) or the voice-identity of the speaker (Experiment 2) in increasing levels of auditory noise. For speech recognition, we observed that 14 of 30 participants (47%) showed a face-benefit. 19 of 25 participants (76%) showed a face-benefit for voice-identity recognition. For those participants who demonstrated a face-benefit, the face-benefit increased with auditory noise levels. Taken together, the results support an audio-visual model of auditory communication and suggest that the brain can develop a flexible system in which learned facial characteristics are used to deal with varying auditory uncertainty.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Maguinness et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5b5efb6db64358754e5edhttps://doi.org/10.1177/17470218241278649
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme42015 · 88,645 citations
  2. 2The cortical organization of speech processing2007 · 5,667 citations
  3. 3Prevalence of age-related hearing loss in Europe: a review2011 · 336 citations
  4. 4Variability and stability in the McGurk effect: contributions of participants, stimuli, time, and response type2015 · 155 citations
  5. 5Intra‐ and inter‐modal repetition priming of familiar faces and voices1997 · 147 citations