PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 19, 2024Materials3 citationsOpen Access

Effect of Scaffold Geometrical Structure on Macrophage Polarization during Bone Regeneration Using Honeycomb Tricalcium Phosphate

View Full Paper
KTKiyofumi TakabatakeHTHidetsugu TsujigiwaKNKeisuke Nakano

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The polarization balance of M1/M2 macrophages with different functions is important in osteogenesis and bone repair processes. In a previous study, we succeeded in developing honeycomb tricalcium phosphate (TCP), which is a cylindrical scaffold with a honeycomb arrangement of straight pores, and we demonstrated that TCP with 300 and 500 μm pore diameters (300TCP and 500TCP) induced bone formation within the pores. However, the details of the influence of macrophage polarization on bone formation using engineered biomaterials, especially with respect to the geometric structure of the artificial biomaterials, are unknown. In this study, we examined whether differences in bone tissue formation due to differences in TCP geometry were due to the polarity of the assembling macrophages. Immunohistochemistry for IBA-1, iNOS, and CD163 single staining was performed. The 300TCP showed a marked infiltration of iNOS-positive cells, which are thought to be M1 macrophages, during the osteogenesis process, while no involvement of CD163-positive cells, which are thought to be M2 macrophages, was observed in the TCP pores. In addition, 500TCP showed a clustering of iNOS-positive cells and CD163-positive cells at 2 weeks, suggesting the involvement of M2 macrophages in the formation of bone tissue in the TCP pores. In conclusion, we demonstrated for the first time that the geometrical structure of the artificial biomaterial, i.e., the pore size of honeycomb TCP, affects the polarization of M1/2 macrophages and bone tissue formation in TCP pores.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Takabatake et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5bb33b6db64358755372fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ma17164108
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Biomaterials science and surface engineering strategies for dental peri-implantitis management2024 · 70 citations
  2. 2Effects of geometry of hydroxyapatite as a cell substratum in BMP-induced ectopic bone formation2000 · 170 citations
  3. 3Pattern Recognition Receptors and Inflammation2010 · 8,826 citations
  4. 4EZH1 Is Associated with TCP-Induced Bone Regeneration through Macrophage Polarization2018 · 15 citations
  5. 5Natural graft tissues and synthetic biomaterials for periodontal and alveolar bone reconstructive applications: a review2017 · 393 citations