PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 8, 2025Journal of The Electrochemical Society0 citationsOpen Access

Hybrid Neural Networks for Lithium-Ion Batteries State of Health Estimation and Remaining Useful Life Prediction

View Full Paper
SZShuangli ZhuXZXugang ZhangYWYan Wang

Key Points

  • The hybrid VMD-BiLSTM-Transformer model significantly improves state of health estimation in lithium-ion batteries, achieving a root mean square error of 1.27% for CALCE.
  • For remaining useful life prediction, the model demonstrates superior accuracy, with a mean squared error of just 0.02% for CALCE datasets.
  • The approach integrates variational modal decomposition for data preprocessing, enhancing the prediction's reliability by reducing noise.
  • Robustness and generalization capabilities of the hybrid model are validated across CALCE and Oxford datasets.

Abstract

Abstract Lithium-ion batteries deteriorate due to long-term charging and discharging, leading to performance degradation and safety hazards, so precisely evaluating the state of health (SOH) and remaining useful life (RUL) of lithium-ion batteries is essential for battery safety assurance. To address the issue of poor accuracy of current SOH estimation and RUL prediction methods, this paper proposes a hybrid VMD-BiLSTM-Transformer model. First, a variational modal decomposition is applied to reduce noise and segment the raw data, eliminating capacity regeneration. Second, a combination of bidirectional long short-term memory network (BiLSTM) and Transformer is employed to accurately capture features and fuse global information by utilizing its bidirectional information processing and self-attention mechanisms. Finally, the proposed model is verified on CALCE and Oxford datasets to demonstrate superior prediction accuracy compared to the benchmark models. Specifically, for SOH prediction, the root mean square error is 1.27% for CALCE and 0.23% for Oxford, while the mean absolute error is 0.99% for CALCE and 0.45% for Oxford. Similarly, for RUL prediction, the mean squared error is 0.02% for CALCE and 0.0006% for Oxford. This fully demonstrates that the proposed model exhibits excellent generalization capability and robustness.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhu et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5c1be6950a706b22b56f2https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ae0feb
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper