PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 11, 20240 citationsOpen Access

MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutations in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Testing Considerations and Clinical Outcomes a 3 years screening experience

View Full Paper
RLRomain LoyauxRDRym Ben DhiabSGSimon Garinet

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Background MET exon 14 skipping is an oncogenic driver observed in 1 to 4% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MET exon 14 mutations affect splice sites and are highly heterogeneous which makes them difficult to detect. Because of the approval of capmatinib for patients with MET exon 14 mutated tumors and the related poor response to immunotherapy (ICI) for a subset of patients with MET mutated tumors, MET screening has become mandatory for first line treatment decision. Methods Here we report our testing experience based on 1143 consecutive NSCLC addressed for molecular diagnosis. Two strategies using either DNA sequencing (NGS) and fragment analysis or DNA-RNA sequencing (NGS) were developed and validated to accurately detect MET exon 14 alterations including large deletions. For patients with MET tumors (n = 46), demographic characteristics, treatments and outcomes were obtained from medical records and discussed. Results 46 MET exon 14 alterations were identified, 4 were not called by DNA sequencing and rescued by fragment analysis or RNA sequencing. Sixty-seven percent tumors had a high PD-L1 expression > 50% and 42% of cases had co-occurring alterations, mainly TP53 mutations (24%) and PIK3CA mutations (9%). Response to MET inhibitors (Crizotinib and Capmatinib) was evaluated for 15 patients. The ORR (Objective Response Rate) and the median of PFS (Progression Free Survival) were 44% and 5.5 months 1.6–18.2 months respectively. Thirteen patients were treated by immunotherapy, ORR and median PFS (Progression Free Survival) median were 30% and 4 months 0.7–55.5 months respectively. The response to immunotherapy was not correlated with PD-L1 status but smokers seemed to better respond to ICIs. Conclusions This study highlights that a multimodal approach may be necessary to detect MET exon 14 mutations as large deletions may not be detected by DNA sequencing. Targeted DNA-ARN sequencing strategies broadly interrogate the diverse druggable genomic variations and permits direct detection of altered splicing or gene fusions. Because patients with MET exon 14 mutated tumors, demonstrate low response to immunotherapy despite high PDL1 and because MET exon 14 is druggable the detection of MET mutations is mandatory to optimize treatment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Loyaux et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5cb6fb6db64358756229dhttps://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4520709/v1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Global cancer statistics, 20122015 · 27,419 citations
  2. 2Somatic Mutations Lead to an Oncogenic Deletion of Met in Lung Cancer2006 · 488 citations
  3. 3Comparison of Molecular Testing Modalities for Detection of ROS1 Rearrangements in a Cohort of Positive Patient Samples2018 · 184 citations
  4. 4Efficacy and safety of crizotinib in patients (pts) with advanced MET exon 14-altered non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).2016 · 114 citations
  5. 5Treatment of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Erlotinib or Gefitinib2011 · 421 citations