PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 10, 2024Open Ceramics8 citationsOpen Access

Rapid densification of nanocrystalline zirconia: Pressureless versus pressure-assisted spark plasma sintering

View Full Paper
AKAndraž KocjanNBNikhil BhootpurAIAljaž Ivekovič

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Spark plasma sintering (SPS) is the most straightforward way to rapidly sinter nanoceramics, but the applied pressure prevents sintering of additively manufactured ceramics. Therefore, fast firing techniques such as "pressureless" SPS and ultra-fast high-temperature sintering, based on intense thermal radiation, are gaining interest. Here we compare pressure/current-assisted and pressureless SPS techniques for the rapid heating (∼300 °C/min, 5 min) of nanocrystalline zirconia with high sintering activity. The applied pressure and current indeed contributed to the lowestr temperatures needed for full densification of nanocrystalline zirconia, retaining very fine grain size, but also induced tetragonal phase transformations in the final sintering stages. When the radiative heat transfer was "decoupled" (pressureless SPS), a pronounced temperature difference between graphite crucible wall and simulated specimen temperature along with non-steady-state conditions during dwell were observed. Nevertheless, high heating rates facilitated fine and dense microstructures even in the absence of pressure/current.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kocjan et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5cc66b6db643587562878https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceram.2024.100657
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper