PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 6, 2024Academic Medicine7 citationsOpen Access

Contribution of Basic Science Education to the Professional Identity Development of Medical Learners: A Critical Scoping Review

View Full Paper
JLJanet E. LindsleyEAEmine Ercikan AbaliEAElliot A. Asare

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Professional identity development (PID) has become an important focus of medical education. To date, contributions of basic science education to physician PID have not been broadly explored. This review explores the literature surrounding the contribution of basic science education to the PID of medical learners and interprets findings critically in terms of the landscapes of practice (LoP) framework. Method In this critical scoping review, the authors searched 12 different databases and professional organization websites from January 1988 to October 2022 for references relating to how, if at all, the basic science component of medical education contributes to the PID of medical learners. The LoP learning theory was chosen as a framework for critically interpreting the identified articles. Results Of the 6,674 identified references, 257 met the inclusion criteria. After data extraction, content analysis of recorded key findings was used to ensure all findings were incorporated into the synthesis. Findings aligned with and were critically interpreted in relation to the 3 LoP modes of identification: engagement (engaging in the work of a physician), imagination (imagining oneself becoming a “good doctor”), and alignment (aligning with the practices and expectations of a medical community or specialty). Within each mode of identification, it was possible to see how basic science may support, or catalyze, PID and how basic science may serve as a barrier, or an inhibitor, to PID or contribute to the development of negative aspects of identity development. Conclusions The LoP learning theory suggests that the effect of basic science on physicians’ PID is most effective if educators view themselves as guides through interfaces between their scientific disciplines and medicine. Learners need opportunities to be engaged, to imagine how their current learning activities and developing skills will be useful as future physicians, and to feel alignment with medical specialties.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lindsley et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5d358b6db643587569db0https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000005833
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies2009 · 10,656 citations
  2. 2The Collaborative Construction of the Clinical Mind: Excellence in Patient Care through Cognitive Integration of Basic Sciences Concepts into Routine Clinical Practice2015 · 1 citations
  3. 3The cultural divide: exploring communication barriers between scientists and clinicians2011 · 54 citations
  4. 4Osler and the Way We Were Taught2017 · 20 citations
  5. 5Medical Biochemistry in the Era of Competencies: Is it Time for the Krebs Cycle to go?2012 · 20 citations