PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 2024Computer Law Review International3 citations

Defining AI Systems in the EU and Beyond

View Full Paper
TKTheodoros Karathanasis

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this article is to assess the current global reach of the European Union’s regulatory influence on AI. This analysis focuses on how an “AI system” is defined in the final EU AI Act and presents the hypothesis that the more rigid the definition of AI systems is, the less global the reach of the EU AI Act’s standards will be, especially in countries with a strong tendency towards AI sovereignty. A qualitative comparative analysis of four case studies (Brazil, Canada, Chile, USA) reveals persistent divergences centred on the material scope of AI systems. In turn, the global reach of the EU AI Act seems rather limited at best in the long term.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Theodoros Karathanasis (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5dfdcb6db643587574906https://doi.org/10.9785/cri-2024-250402
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1What are AI systems? Rethinking the core definition in the EU AI Act2026
  2. 2EU Influence in Global AI Governance and its Limits2026
  3. 3Mind the competitiveness gap: Measuring the AI Act’s extraterritorial reach2026
  4. 4EU Artificial Intelligence Act will have limited reach2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5AI Governance in the Context of the EU AI Act (Extended Abstract)2025