PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 31, 2024European Law Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Why an EU country under the surveillance procedure (Article 7.1 TEU) should not chair the Council Presidency

View Full Paper
ECEmilio De CapitaniVDVirgilio Dastoli

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Mutual trust that is the bedrock of intra‐EU cooperation should not be equated to ‘blind trust’ when a Member State is under the ‘surveillance’ procedure foreseen by Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union. In this perspective it would be risky for the European Council to recognise a key coordinating role, as is the case when holding the Council Presidency, to a Member State under Article 7.1 TUE. It would then be sensible for the Council to modify its 2016 Decision, and delay the Hungarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union to such a time when the Article 7(1) TEU surveillance procedure will have been successfully concluded.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Capitani et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5e4f0b6db643587579e4dhttps://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12510
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper