PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 30, 2024BMC Cancer13 citationsOpen Access

Clinical and radiological effects of Bevacizumab for the treatment of radionecrosis after stereotactic brain radiotherapy

View Full Paper
TMTeuta Zoto MustafayevMTMenekşe TurnaYBYasemin Bölükbaşı

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this multicenter retrospective study was to analyze the clinical and radiological effects of bevacizumab (BV) on radionecrosis (RN) that developed after stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for brain metastasis. Methods Forty patients with SRT related symptomatic brain RN treated in 10 radiation oncology centers were analyzed. The clinical response to BV treatment was categorized as follows: complete (no additional treatment required), partial (requiring either steroids or repeat BV), and unresponsive (requiring surgery). The radiological features of brain RN were analyzed in 10 patients whose serial MRI scans were available after corticosteroid and BV treatments. Results BV was used as a first line treatment in 11 (27.5%) and as a second line treatment in 29 (72.5%) of patients. The neurological symptoms regressed in 77.5% of patients after treatment with BV (45% complete response, 32.5% partial response). The median edema volume increased from 75.9 cc (range: 5.9-125.8 cc) at RN to 113.65 cc (range: 1.5-382.1 cc) after use of corticosteroids, representing a rate of 39.8% increase ( p = 0.074). However, after BV treatment the median volume of edema decreased to 19.5 cc (range: 0-163.3 cc) which represents a difference of 62.2% ( p = 0.041) from RN. Conclusion The use of BV caused clinical response rate of 77.5% and a good radiological response in corticosteroid unresponsive patients. The role of BV should be further investigated in prospective studies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mustafayev et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5e6efb6db64358757b93bhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12643-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Surgical resection or bevacizumab for treatment of radiation necrosis-associated cerebral edema in patients with brain metastases: a single center experience2026 · 2 citations
  2. 2Bevacizumab reduces cerebral radiation necrosis due to stereotactic radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases: an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis2024 · 4 citations
  3. 3RDTA-05 BEVACIZUMAB FOR RADIATION-INDUCED BRAIN NECROSIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AND COHORT STUDIES2025
  4. 4P09.16.A TREATMENT OF BRAIN RADIONECROSIS: A SURVEY OF PROVISION OF CARE AND ACCESS TO BEVACIZUMAB IN THE UNITED KINGDOM2025
  5. 5Efficacy Analysis of Stereotactic Radiosurgery Combined with Multicycle Low-dose Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Brain Metastases Located in the Motor Cortex2025