PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 17, 2024BMC Veterinary Research6 citationsOpen Access

Perceptions and practices of Swedish wild boar hunters in relation to African swine fever before the first outbreak in Sweden

View Full Paper
ECErika ChenaisLELinda ErnholmABAnnie Frisk Brunzell

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Background The first outbreak of African Swine Fever (ASF) in Sweden was detected in 2023 in wild boar. This study was conducted before the first ASF outbreak with the objective of investigating Swedish hunters’ perceptions and practices pertaining to ASF ahead of any potential future outbreak. A mixed-methods interview study with Swedish wild boar hunters, consisting of focus group discussions and a questionnaire, was undertaken between October 2020 and December 2021. Six focus groups were conducted online, and an online questionnaire with questions related to practices and habits concerning hunting, the use of bait and hunting trips was sent to all members of the Swedish Hunting and Wildlife Association. A total of 3244 responses were received. Results Three general themes were identified in a thematic analysis of the data from the focus groups: hunters are willing to engage in ASF prevention and control, simplicity and feasibility are crucial for the implementation of reporting, sampling and control measures, and more information and the greater involvement of the authorities are required in ASF prevention and control. Results from the questionnaire showed that the use of bait was common. Products of animal origin were rarely used for baiting; the most common product used was maize. Hunting trips abroad, especially outside of the Nordic countries, were uncommon. Conclusions Hunting tourism and the use of bait do not seem to constitute a major risk for the introduction of ASF to wild boar populations in Sweden. The accessibility of relevant information for each concerned stakeholder and the ease of reporting and sampling are crucial to maintain the positive engagement of hunters.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chenais et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e60005b6db643587593365https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-024-04183-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Community engagement for COVID-19 prevention and control: a rapid evidence synthesis2020 · 470 citations
  2. 2Who's To Blame for the COVID-19 pandemic? Perceptions of responsibility during the crisis using text mining and latent Dirichlet allocation2024 · 3 citations
  3. 3Application of Routines that Contribute to On-farm Biosecurity as Reported by Swedish Livestock Farmers2010 · 112 citations
  4. 4Biogeographical variation in the population density of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in western Eurasia2006 · 203 citations
  5. 5Understanding and improving biosecurity among recreational anglers in Great Britain2023 · 12 citations