PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 9, 2024Energy & Fuels4 citations

Graded Evaluation and Controls on In Situ Oil Content within Lacustrine Shale of the Upper Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation, Songliao Basin, China

View Full Paper
XSXindi ShaoYSYan SongLJLin Jiang

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

A pyrolysis parameter S1 is widely used to evaluate the oiliness of rocks. When the S1 (free hydrocarbon) is used to evaluate shale oil resources, there is often a phenomenon of light hydrocarbon loss and heavy hydrocarbon loss, resulting in underestimation of the amount of resources. To accurately estimate the oil content of shale, this study establishes a light hydrocarbon recovery coefficient curve based on routine rock pyrolysis and related geochemical tests, and calculates a heavy hydrocarbon correction coefficient. This study have ascertained the in situ oil content of the Qingshankou Formation shale in the northern part of the Songliao Basin, identified the controlling factors of in situ oil content, and quantitatively assessed the mobility and movable resource volume of shale oil. The research reveals that light hydrocarbon loss ranges from 0.01 to 8.69 mg HC/g Rock, heavy hydrocarbon loss varies between 0.04 and 4.05 mg HC/g Rock, and in situ oil content spans from 0.04 to 16.38 mg HC/g Rock. The latter accounts for roughly 3.9 to 6.3 times the measured S1, indicating that the district is mainly enriched and moderately riched with resources. Organic matter abundance, thermal evolution degree, and reservoir structure are the principal factors controlling the in situ oil content of shale. Movable oil content ranges from 0.02 to 11.30 mg HC/g Rock, and the movable resource quantity approximates 84.84 × 108 t, constituting about 59.45% of the total resources, suggesting large potential and high mobility. The results of this study can provide theoretical and practical guidance for shale oil resource evaluation and sweet spot optimization in the regional area.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shao et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e60e42b6db6435875a0f4dhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c02003
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Geochemical Characteristics of Mature to High-Maturity Shale Resources, Occurrence State of Shale Oil, and Sweet Spot Evaluation in the Qingshankou Formation, Gulong Sag, Songliao Basin2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2Hydrocarbon micro‐migration and differential enrichment mechanism of shale oil in upper Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in Songliao Basin2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Quantitative characterization of different occurrence states in medium maturity continental shale oil: a case study on eocene Shahejie formation shales, Qikou Sag, East China2025
  4. 4Loss Characteristics and Quantitative Restoration Model of Light Hydrocarbons in Shale Oil from the Chang 7₃ Submember of the Ordos Basin2026
  5. 5Distribution of Shale Oil, Quantitative Evaluation of Mobility, and Enrichment Mechanisms in a Lacustrine Shale from the Ordos Basin2026