PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 3, 20246 citationsOpen Access

Transcriptome-wide characterization of genetic perturbations

View Full Paper
ANAjay NadigJRJoseph M. ReplogleAPAngela N. Pogson

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Single cell CRISPR screens such as Perturb-seq enable transcriptomic profiling of genetic perturbations at scale. However, the data produced by these screens are often noisy due to cost and technical constraints, limiting power to detect true effects with conventional differential expression analyses. Here, we introduce TRanscriptome-wide Analysis of Differential Expression (TRADE), a statistical framework which estimates the transcriptome-wide distribution of true differential expression effects from noisy gene-level measurements. Within TRADE, we derive multiple novel, interpretable statistical metrics, including the “transcriptome-wide impact”, an estimator of the overall transcriptional effect of a perturbation which is stable across sampling depths. We analyze new and published large-scale Perturb-seq datasets to show that many true transcriptional effects are not statistically significant, but detectable in aggregate with TRADE. In a genome-scale Perturb-seq screen, we find that a typical gene perturbation affects an estimated 45 genes, whereas a typical essential gene perturbation affects over 500 genes. An advantage of our approach is its ability to compare the transcriptomic effects of genetic perturbations across contexts and dosages despite differences in power. We use this ability to identify perturbations with cell-type dependent effects and to find examples of perturbations where transcriptional responses are not only larger in magnitude, but also qualitatively different, as a function of dosage. Lastly, we expand our analysis to case/control comparison of gene expression for neuropsychiatric conditions, finding that transcriptomic effect correlations are greater than genetic correlations for these diagnoses. TRADE lays an analytic foundation for the systematic comparison of genetic perturbation atlases, as well as differential expression experiments more broadly.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nadig et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e617f5b6db6435875aa0dfhttps://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.03.601903
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height2010 · 4,900 citations
  2. 2Novel insights into erythroid development revealed through in vitro differentiation of GATA-1 embryonic stem cells.1994 · 562 citations
  3. 3Dynamic regulation of genome-wide pre-mRNA splicing and stress tolerance by the Sm-like protein LSm5 in Arabidopsis2014 · 2,340 citations
  4. 4Shared molecular neuropathology across major psychiatric disorders parallels polygenic overlap2018 · 1,181 citations
  5. 5Computational correction of copy number effect improves specificity of CRISPR–Cas9 essentiality screens in cancer cells2017 · 2,195 citations