PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2024The Astrophysical Journal3 citationsOpen Access

Type Ia Supernova Progenitor Properties and their Host Galaxies

View Full Paper
SCSudeshna ChakrabortyBSBenjamin SadlerPHP. Hoêflich

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We present an eigenfunction method to analyze 161 visual light curves (LCs) of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) obtained by the Carnegie Supernova Project to characterize their diversity and host-galaxy correlations. The eigenfunctions are based on the delayed-detonation (DD) scenario using three parameters: the LC stretch s determined by the amount of deflagration burning governing the 56Ni production, the main-sequence mass M MS of the progenitor white dwarf controlling the explosion energy, and its central density ρ c shifting the 56Ni distribution. Our analysis tool (Supernova Parameter Analysis Tool) extracts the parameters from observations and projects them into physical space using their allowed ranges (M MS ≤ 8 M ⊙, ρ c ≤ 7-8 × 109 g cm−3). The residuals between fits and individual LC points are ≈1%-3% for ≈92% of objects. We find two distinct M MS groups corresponding to a fast (≈4-65 Myr) and a slow(≈200-500 Myr) stellar evolution. Most underluminous SNe Ia have hosts with low star formation but high M MS, suggesting slow evolution times of the progenitor system. 91T-like SNe show very similar LCs and high M MS and are correlated to star formation regions, making them potentially important tracers of star formation in the early Universe out to z ≈ 4-11. Some ∼6% outliers with nonphysical parameters using DD scenarios can be attributed to superluminous SNe Ia and subluminous SNe Ia with hosts of active star formation. For deciphering the SNe Ia diversity and high-precision SNe Ia cosmology, the importance is shown for LCs covering out to ≈60 days past maximum. Finally, our method and results are discussed within the framework of multiple explosion scenarios, and in light of upcoming surveys.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chakraborty et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e61df7b6db6435875b014bhttps://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad4702
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Helium-accreting degenerate dwarfs as presupernovae and scenarios for the ultrasoft x-ray sources1994 · 78 citations
  2. 2The Morphology of Type IA Supernovae Light Curves1996 · 232 citations
  3. 3Accreting white dwarf models of Type I supernovae. III - Carbon deflagration supernovae1984 · 1,451 citations
  4. 4Type IA supernovae in elliptical and spiral galaxies - Possible differences in photometric homogeneity1989 · 33 citations
  5. 5ZTF Early Observations of Type Ia Supernovae. III. Early-time Colors As a Test for Explosion Models and Multiple Populations2020 · 40 citations