PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2024Journal of Personnel Psychology2 citationsOpen Access

Everything Under Control? The Impact of Electronic Monitoring Type and Social Norms on Privacy and Reactance

View Full Paper
MWM. WolffCNCornelia Niessen

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract: Digitalization enables continuous monitoring of not only work processes but also employees’ cognitive, emotional, and behavioral activities. This study investigated how different types of electronic monitoring affect employees’ privacy and reactance and how social norms regarding electronic monitoring (opposition or support) shape these reactions. In a scenario study, we found higher privacy invasion and reactance when not solely screen time was monitored, but screen activity via screenshots or social interactions via face reader. The social norm did not influence these relations. However, we found strong compliance with the social norm of rejecting electronic monitoring, indicating a strong negative attitude toward electronic monitoring. The results suggest that invasiveness of electronic performance monitoring beyond screen time monitoring is perceived as high privacy-invasive and comparatively reactance-evoking.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wolff et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e61e05b6db6435875b093fhttps://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000338
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper