PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2024Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey1 citationsOpen Access

Simple Versus Radical Hysterectomy in Women With Low-Risk Cervical Cancer

View Full Paper
MPMarie PlanteJKJanice S. KwonSFSarah E. Ferguson

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

(Abstracted from N Engl J Med 2024;390:9) Radical hysterectomy is the standard-of-care treatment for early-stage cervical cancer; however, observational studies suggest no survival benefit between patients who undergo radical hysterectomy versus simple hysterectomy for stage IA2 cervical cancer. Additionally, 2 recent large studies have raised the question of whether simple hysterectomy compares favorably overall with radical hysterectomy in stage IA2 or IB1 disease with mixed evidence.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Plante et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e62079b6db6435875b24a2https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0001027468.31773.ca
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Simple versus Radical Hysterectomy in Women with Low-Risk Cervical Cancer2024 · 271 citations
  2. 2Commentary on: Comparative outcomes of simple versus radical hysterectomy in patients with and without very low-risk early-stage cervical cancer: An exploratory analysis from the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Canadian Cancer Trials Group Cx.5/SHAPE trial2026
  3. 3Survival After Simple Compared With Radical Hysterectomy for Patients With Early-Stage Cervical Cancer2024 · 3 citations
  4. 4Radical Hysterectomy for Non‐Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer With Cervical Involvement: A Retrospective Cohort Study2026
  5. 5Science, Medicine, and the Anesthesiologist2024