PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 27, 2024Critical Care12 citationsOpen Access

Sex differences in the SOFA score of ICU patients with sepsis or septic shock: a nationwide analysis

View Full Paper
TZTobias ZimmermannPKPhilip R. KaufmannSASimon A. Amacher

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Background The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is an important tool in diagnosing sepsis and quantifying organ dysfunction. However, despite emerging evidence of differences in sepsis pathophysiology between women and men, sex is currently not being considered in the SOFA score. We aimed to investigate potential sex-specific differences in organ dysfunction, as measured by the SOFA score, in patients with sepsis or septic shock and explore outcome associations. Methods Retrospective analysis of sex-specific differences in the SOFA score of prospectively enrolled ICU patients with sepsis or septic shock admitted to one of 85 certified Swiss ICUs between 01/2021 and 12/2022. Results Of 125,782 patients, 5947 (5%) were admitted with a clinical diagnosis of sepsis (2244, 38%) or septic shock (3703, 62%). Of these, 5078 (37% women) were eligible for analysis. A statistically significant difference of the total SOFA score on admission was found between women (mean 7.5 ± SD 3.6 points) and men (7.8 ± 3.6 points, Wilcoxon rank-sum p < 0.001). This was driven by differences in the coagulation ( p = 0.008), liver ( p < 0.001) and renal ( p < 0.001) SOFA components. Differences between sexes were more prominent in younger patients < 52 years of age (women 7.1 ± 4.0 points vs men 8.1 ± 4.2 points, p = 0.004). No sex-specific differences were found in ICU length of stay (women median 2.6 days (IQR 1.3–5.3) vs men 2.7 days (IQR 1.2–6.0), p = 0.13) and ICU mortality (women 14% vs men 15%, p = 0.17). Conclusion Sex-specific differences exist in the SOFA score of patients admitted to a Swiss ICU with sepsis or septic shock, particularly in laboratory-based components. Although the clinical meaningfulness of these differences is unclear, a reevaluation of sex-specific thresholds for SOFA score components is warranted in an attempt to make more accurate and individualised classifications. Graphical abstract

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zimmermann et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e62ea5b6db6435875c14dehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-04996-y
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Sepsis in the Emergency Department: Different Faces, Same Fate? A Sex-Based Prognostic Analysis2026
  2. 2A comparative analysis of qSOFA and SOFA score for outcome prediction among obstetric patients admitted to intensive care unit at a tertiary care centre2025
  3. 3Evaluation of SOFA score (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score) in hospitalised patients with sepsis2024
  4. 4Sex Differences in Short- and Long-Term Survival Among Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis2021 · 6 citations
  5. 5The new SOFA for sepsis identification and mortality prediction: a multicenter cohort study2026 · 1 citations