PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 27, 2024Journal of Clinical Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

The Ventilatory Ratio as a Predictor of Successful Weaning from a Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenator

View Full Paper
AFAnna FischbachSWSteffen B. WiegandJSJ. Simons

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Background: Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is a critical intervention for patients with severe lung failure, especially acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The weaning process from ECMO relies largely on expert opinion due to a lack of evidence-based guidelines. The ventilatory ratio (VR), which correlates with dead space and mortality in ARDS, is calculated as minute ventilation (mL/min) x arterial pCO2 (mmHg)/predicted body weight × 100 × 37.5. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine whether the VR alone can serve as a reliable predictor of safe or unsafe liberation from VV-ECMO in critically ill patients. Methods: A multicenter retrospective analysis was conducted, involving ARDS patients undergoing VV-ECMO weaning at Massachusetts General Hospital (January 2016 - December 2020) and at the University Hospital Aachen (January 2012-December 2021). Safe liberation was defined as no need for ECMO recannulation within 48 h after decannulation. Clinical parameters were obtained for both centers at the same time point: 30 min after the start of the SGOT (sweep gas off trial). Results: Of the patients studied, 83.3% (70/84) were successfully weaned from VV-ECMO. The VR emerged as a significant predictor of unsafe liberation (OR per unit increase: 0.38; CI: 0.17-0.81; p = 0.01). Patients who could not be safely liberated had longer ICU and hospital stays, with a trend towards higher mortality (38% vs. 13%; p = 0.05). Conclusions: The VR may be a valuable predictor for safe liberation from VV-ECMO in ARDS patients, with higher VR values associated with an elevated risk of unsuccessful weaning and adverse clinical outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fischbach et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e63117b6db6435875c2de0https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13133758
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper