PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 26, 2024The Journal of Chemical Physics20 citations

Benchmarking water adsorption on metal surfaces with ab initio molecular dynamics

View Full Paper
MXMianle XuSLSihang LiuSVSudarshan Vijay

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Solid-water interfaces are ubiquitous in nature and technology. In particular, technologies evolving in the green transition, such as electrocatalysis, heavily rely on the junction of an electrolyte and an electrode as a central part of the device. For the understanding of atomic-scale processes taking place at the electrolyte-electrode interface, density functional theory (DFT) has become the de facto standard. The validation of DFT’s ability to simulate the interfacial solid/water interaction is crucial, and ideal simulation setups need to be identified in order to prevent avoidable systematic errors. Here, we develop a rigorous sampling protocol for benchmarking the adsorption/desorption energetics of water on metallic surfaces against experimental temperature programmed desorption, single crystal adsorption calorimetry, and thermal energy atom scattering. We screened DFT’s quality on a series of transition metal surfaces, applying three of the most common exchange-correlation approximations: PBE-D3, RPBE-D3, and BEEF-vdW. We find that all three xc-functionals reflect the pseudo-zeroth order desorption of water rooted in the combination of attractive adsorbate-adsorbate interactions and their saturation at low and intermediate coverages, respectively. However, both RPBE-D3 and BEEF-vdW lead to more accurate water adsorption strengths, while PBE-D3 clearly overbinds near-surface water. We relate the variations in binding strength to specific variations in water-metal and water-water interactions, highlighting the structural consequences inherent in an uninformed choice of simulation parameters. Our study gives atomistic insight into water’s complex adsorption equilibrium. Furthermore, it represents a guideline for future DFT-based simulations of solvated solid interfaces by providing an assessment of systematic errors in specific setups.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xu et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6327cb6db6435875c41f4https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0205552
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations1976 · 71,605 citations
  2. 2Calorimetry and Thermal Methods in Catalysis2013 · 117 citations
  3. 3Van der Waals Density Functional for General Geometries2004 · 5,662 citations
  4. 4How to extract adsorption energies, adsorbate–adsorbate interaction parameters and saturation coverages from temperature programmed desorption experiments2021 · 9 citations
  5. 5The structure of water at a Pt(111) electrode and the potential of zero charge studied from first principles2016 · 183 citations