PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 25, 2024International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

To Compare the Effects of IV Bolus Doses Phenylephrine, And Ephedrine Injection in Maintaining Arterial Blood Pressure During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Sections-A Randomized Comparative Study

View Full Paper
NPNiranjan PrabhuramSri Venkateswara Medical College and Ruia HospitalRTRaghuraman TRSri Venkateswara Medical College and Ruia HospitalASA. SelviSri Venkateswara Medical College and Ruia Hospital

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Spinal anesthesia is the preferred anesthetic approach for cesarean sections due to its benefits for both the mother and fetus. However, hypotension is a common and potentially harmful complication. Phenylephrine (PE) is frequently used as a vasopressor to manage hypotension during spinal anesthesia, but it can cause maternal sinus bradycardia. This study aimed to compare two strategies for maintaining arterial blood pressure during cesarean delivery: a 20 mcg bolus of phenylephrine followed by a 10 mcg/min infusion (Group P) versus a 6 mg bolus of ephedrine followed by a 0.1 mg/min infusion (Group E). A total of 100 pregnant women scheduled for elective or emergency cesarean sections under spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned to either Group P or Group E. Systolic blood pressure was well-maintained in both groups during the first 20 minutes. After this period, Group P’s blood pressure stabilized towards basal values, while Group E's remained slightly above basal levels—a statistically significant difference (p < 0.005). Diastolic blood pressure fell in both groups, but Group E maintained slightly higher levels than Group P. Group P had a 24% incidence of bradycardia requiring atropine, while no such cases were observed in Group E. Despite these differences, overall maternal arterial blood pressure was effectively maintained in both groups, with no significant difference in uterine tone or bleeding levels.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Prabhuram et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e637ebb6db6435875c9474https://doi.org/10.26452/ijrps.v15i2.4684
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper