PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 20, 2024Business & Society4 citationsOpen Access

Corporate Accountability for Human Rights: Evidence From Conflict Mineral Ratings

View Full Paper
HAHabiba Al‐ShaerKAKhaldoon AlbitarKHKhaled Hussainey

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This article examines the impact of sustainability-oriented governance factors on companies reporting on due diligence requirements of conflict minerals (DDRCM). We use the rating scores that are assigned by the Responsible Sourcing Network (RSN) on a sample of multinational companies between 2015 and 2019. We consider whether the existence and type of an independent external audit, the existence of sustainability reports to communicate a firm’s message, the inclusion of sustainability-related targets in executive compensation contracts, and the existence of board-level sustainability committees are associated with DDRCM reporting. We find that the combined effect of sustainability-oriented governance factors is associated with higher DDRCM reporting suggesting that sustainability governance plays an effective role in shaping the corporate response to conflict mineral risks. We also find that effective boards moderate the association between sustainability governance and DDRCM reporting suggesting that effective boards can substitute for the resources that are required for sustainability governance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Al‐Shaer et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e63e39b6db6435875d0645https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503241254829
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper