PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 15, 2024The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging17 citationsOpen Access

CMR-based cardiac phenotyping in different forms of heart failure

View Full Paper
TLTorben LangeSBSören J. BackhausASAlexander Schulz

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Heart failure (HF) is a heterogenous disease requiring precise diagnostics and knowledge of pathophysiological processes. Since structural and functional imaging data are scarce we hypothesized that cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-based analyses would provide accurate characterization and mechanistic insights into different HF groups comprising preserved (HFpEF), mid-range (HFmrEF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). 22 HFpEF, 17 HFmrEF and 15 HFrEF patients as well as 19 healthy volunteers were included. CMR image assessment contained left atrial (LA) and left ventricular (LV) volumetric evaluation as well as left atrioventricular coupling index (LACI). Furthermore, CMR feature-tracking included LV and LA strain in terms of reservoir (Es), conduit (Ee) and active boosterpump (Ea) function. CMR-based tissue characterization comprised T1 mapping as well as late-gadolinium enhancement (LGE) analyses. HFpEF patients showed predominant atrial impairment (Es 20.8%vs.25.4%, p = 0.02 and Ee 8.3%vs.13.5%, p = 0.001) and increased LACI compared to healthy controls (14.5%vs.23.3%, p = 0.004). Patients with HFmrEF showed LV enlargement but mostly preserved LA function with a compensatory increase in LA boosterpump (LA Ea: 15.0%, p = 0.049). In HFrEF LA and LV functional impairment was documented (Es: 14.2%, Ee: 5.4% p HFmrEF > HFpEF). CMR-imaging reveals insights into HF phenotypes with mainly atrial affection in HFpEF, ventricular affection with atrial compensation in HFmrEF and global impairment in HFrEF paralleled by progressive LV fibrosis. These data suggest a necessity for a personalized HF management based on imaging findings for future optimized patient management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lange et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e64892b6db6435875da17ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03145-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cardiovascular magnetic resonance phenotyping of heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction2022 · 10 citations
  2. 2Distinguishing heart failure subtypes: the diagnostic power of different cardiac magnetic resonance imaging parameters2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3The role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction2022 · 14 citations
  4. 4Cardiac magnetic resonance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: myocyte, interstitium, microvascular, and metabolic abnormalities2020 · 41 citations
  5. 5Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in post myocardial infarction patients: a myocardial magnetic resonance (MR) tissue tracking study2022 · 8 citations