PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 15, 20240 citations

Development of a Fair Machine Learning Model to Predict Survival after Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer (Preprint)

View Full Paper
SCSamuel CarbunaruYNYassamin NeshatvarHDHyungrok Do

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Prediction models based on machine learning (ML) methods are being increasingly developed and adopted in healthcare. However, these models may be prone to bias and be considered unfair if they demonstrate variable performance in population subgroups. An unfair model is of particular concern in bladder cancer where disparities have been identified in sex and race subgroups. OBJECTIVE In this study, we developed a ML model to predict survival after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer, and evaluated for potential model bias in sex and race subgroups. We then compared algorithm unfairness mitigation techniques to improve model fairness. METHODS We trained and compared various ML classification algorithms to predict 5-year survival after radical cystectomy using the National Cancer Database. The primary model performance metric was the F1 score. The primary metric for model fairness was the equalized odds ratio (eOR). We compared three algorithm unfairness mitigating techniques to improve the eOR. RESULTS We identified 16, 481 patients; 23. 1% were female; 91. 5% were ‘White’, 5. 0% were ‘Black’, 2. 3% were ‘Hispanic’, and 1. 2% were ‘Asian’. The 5-year mortality rate was 74. 6%. The best naive model was XGBoost which had an F1 score of 0. 860 and eOR of 0. 619. All unfairness mitigation techniques increased the eOR, with correlation remover showing the highest increase and resulting in a final eOR of 0. 750. This mitigated model had F1 scores of 0. 86, 0. 904, and 0. 824 in the full, Black male, and Asian female test sets, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our ML model predicting survival after radical cystectomy exhibited bias across sex and race subgroups. By employing algorithm unfairness mitigation techniques, we improved algorithmic fairness as measured by the eOR. Our study highlights the role of evaluating for model bias but also actively mitigating such disparities to ensure equitable healthcare delivery. We also deploy the first online fair ML model predicting survival after radical cystectomy at https: //nayanlab. shinyapps. io/faircystectomyₛurvival/.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Carbunaru et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e64a0ab6db6435875db103https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.63289
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations2019 · 6,894 citations
  2. 2Facing Imbalanced Data--Recommendations for the Use of Performance Metrics2013 · 813 citations
  3. 3Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries2018 · 88,108 citations
  4. 4MRI‐Based Radiomics Signature for the Preoperative Prediction of Extracapsular Extension of Prostate Cancer2019 · 68 citations
  5. 5Race and Ethnic Categories: A Brief Review of Global Terms and Nomenclature2023 · 61 citations