PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 14, 2024Water Practice & Technology9 citationsOpen Access

Modeling runoff in Bhima River catchment, India: A comparison of artificial neural networks and empirical models

View Full Paper
PDPradip DalaviSBS. R. BhakarJRJitendra Rajput

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Effective water resource management in gauged catchments relies on accurate runoff prediction. For ungauged catchments, empirical models are used due to limited data availability. This study applied artificial neural networks (ANNs) and empirical models to predict runoff in the Bhima River basin. Among the tested models, the ANN-5 model, which utilized rainfall and one-day delayed rainfall as inputs, demonstrated superior performance with minimal error and high efficiency. Statistical results for the ANN-5 model showed excellent outcomes during both training (R = 0.95, NSE = 0.89, RMSE = 17.39, MAE = 0.12, d = 0.97, MBE = 0.12) and testing (R = 0.94, NSE = 0.88, RMSE = 11.47, MAE = 0.03, d = 0.97, MBE = 0.03). Among empirical models, the Coutagine model was the most accurate, with R = 0.82, MBE = 74.36, NSE = 0.94, d = 0.82, KGE = 0.76, MAE = 70.01, MAPE = 20.6%, NRMSE = 0.22, RMSE = 87.4, and DRV = −9.2. In contrast, Khosla's formula (KF) significantly overestimated runoff. The close correlation between observed and ANN-predicted runoff data underscores the model's utility for decision-makers in inflow forecasting, water resource planning, management, and flood forecasting.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dalavi et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e64b22b6db6435875db5b7https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2024.157
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper