PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 14, 2024Blood Advances16 citationsOpen Access

Amphiregulin, ST2, and REG3α biomarker risk algorithms as predictors of nonrelapse mortality in patients with acute GVHD

View Full Paper
AEAaron EtraNJNajla El JurdiNKNikolaos Katsivelos

Key Points

  • Notable algorithms predict nonrelapse mortality in acute graft-versus-host disease patients, enhancing risk stratification.
  • The algorithm with ST2 and REG3α achieved a 0.757 area under the curve, correctly classifying 75% of patients.
  • Assessment using statistical comparison metrics illustrated significant predictive value of biomarker combinations at diagnosis for NRM risk assessment in patients post-transplantation. Algorithm performance varied significantly based on the type of GVHD risk faced by patients, indicating tailored approaches are necessary.

Abstract

Abstract Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major cause of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Algorithms containing either the gastrointestinal (GI) GVHD biomarker amphiregulin (AREG) or a combination of 2 GI GVHD biomarkers (suppressor of tumorigenicity-2 ST2 + regenerating family member 3 alpha REG3α) when measured at GVHD diagnosis are validated predictors of NRM risk but have never been assessed in the same patients using identical statistical methods. We measured the serum concentrations of ST2, REG3α, and AREG by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at the time of GVHD diagnosis in 715 patients divided by the date of transplantation into training (2004-2015) and validation (2015-2017) cohorts. The training cohort (n = 341) was used to develop algorithms for predicting the probability of 12-month NRM that contained all possible combinations of 1 to 3 biomarkers and a threshold corresponding to the concordance probability was used to stratify patients for the risk of NRM. Algorithms were compared with each other based on several metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, proportion of patients correctly classified, sensitivity, and specificity using only the validation cohort (n = 374). All algorithms were strong discriminators of 12-month NRM, whether or not patients were systemically treated (n = 321). An algorithm containing only ST2 + REG3α had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (0.757), correctly classified the most patients (75%), and more accurately risk-stratified those who developed Minnesota standard-risk GVHD and for patients who received posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based prophylaxis. An algorithm containing only AREG more accurately risk-stratified patients with Minnesota high-risk GVHD. Combining ST2, REG3α, and AREG into a single algorithm did not improve performance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Etra et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e64b22b6db6435875db661https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011049
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper