PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 13, 2024Journal of Community Safety and Well-Being0 citationsOpen Access

How judges in Canadian criminal courts define intimate partner violence

View Full Paper
ABAva J. BownsCGCrystal J. GiesbrechtKBKaila C. Bruer

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a substantial problem in Canada, leading to over 100,000 victims reporting to police in Canada annually. However, there is no legal definition or Canadian Criminal Code offence for IPV. The purpose of this study was to examine how judges in the Canadian prairie provinces (Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba) define IPV in criminal cases. One hundred full-text, written judicial decisions from 2016 to 2022 were analyzed. Findings indicate that judges tend to discuss IPV as it relates to sexual and psychological violence; threats, coercive control, and physical violence; isolation and stalking; economic abuse and threats to take children away. Given that current Canadian law does not recognize psychological abuse as a criminal offence, this may signal a need for the creation of a legal definition of IPV to align with how more directly it is being discussed in courtrooms.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bowns et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e64e92b6db6435875df4b2https://doi.org/10.35502/jcswb.387
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper