PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 13, 2024Sustainable Environment Research0 citationsOpen Access

Emission characterizations and environmental impacts of off-road vehicles

View Full Paper
HLHsing-Wang LiCLChia-Hsiang LaiKCKu-Fan Chen

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract This study measured particulate matter (PM) and gaseous pollutants in the exhaust of off-road vehicles (excavators, bulldozers) during idling and working. The fingerprint of metals in PM and the emission factors of off-road vehicles were investigated. The concentrations of total PM (TPM), PM 10 , and PM 2.5 were 14–251, 12–181, and 10–163 mg m −3 , respectively, for two kinds of off-road vehicles. PM 10 occupied 60–70% of TPM, while PM 2.5 accounted for 80–90%of PM 10 . The calculated emission factors were 0.64–0.94, 0.53–0.79, and 0.32–0.49 g BHP −1 h −1 for TPM, PM 10 , and PM 2.5 , respectively. Metallic elements of PM were analyzed in order to evaluate the carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks. The results showed that the emission of total metallic elements from the excavator and two bulldozers are 2.7 and 7.9–22.6 mg m −3 , respectively, and the dominant components are Zn, Fe, and Al. The total carcinogenic risk of Cd and Pb decreased from 9.4 × 10 −8 to 1.3 × 10 −8 with increasing the distance from 0 to 150 m away from the three off-road vehicles (one excavator, and two bulldozers). The non-carcinogenic risk of both Cd and Pb is lower than the limits (hazard index = 1), which is considered acceptable.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e64f79b6db6435875dfc57https://doi.org/10.1186/s42834-024-00213-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper