PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 10, 2024PLoS ONE5 citationsOpen Access

The physical profile of female cricketers: An investigation between playing standard and position

View Full Paper
TBThomas A. BrazierJTJamie TallentSPStephen D. Patterson

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The primary aim of this study was to present the physical profile of female cricketers. Secondary, was to assess any differences between playing standard (professional vs. non-professional) and position (seam bowler vs. non-seam bowler). Fifty-four female cricketers (professional seam bowler n = 16; professional non-seam bowler n = 17; non-professional seam bowler n = 10; non-professional non-seam bowler n = 11) undertook a battery of physical and anthropometric assessments during the off-season period. Participant's physical profile was assessed via the broad jump, countermovement jump, isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP), 20 m sprint, run-2 cricket specific speed test, and Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level-1 (Yo-Yo-IR1). The sum-of-eight skinfold measurement was also recorded for professional cricketers only. Differences between playing standard and position were assessed with a two-way ANOVA. Seam bowlers possessed a significantly (p < 0.04) greater stature and had a higher body mass than non-seam bowlers. Non-seam bowlers recorded significantly (p < 0.01) further broad jump, higher normalised peak vertical force during the IMTP, and ran greater distances during the Yo-Yo-IR1. Professional cricketers produced significantly further run distances for the Yo-Yo-IR1 and faster run-2 times for the dominant turning side than non-professional cricketers. This study provides valuable insights into the physical profile of female cricketers across playing standards and positions which practitioners can use to direct and enhance training outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Brazier et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e65665b6db6435875e50dehttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302647
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Physical Profiles of All-Rounders, Batters, and Bowlers in Sub-Elite Women's Cricket2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2The pre-season variation in physical performance of an elite level female cricket squad2024
  3. 3Physical and Developmental Characteristics of Elite Under-19 Female Cricketers: Positional Differences, Relative Age Effects, and Maturity2026
  4. 4Evolution of anthropometric and physical performance characteristics of international male cricketers from 2014 to 2020 in a World Cup winning nation2022 · 1 citations
  5. 5Anthropometric and biomechanical factors in elite male and female fast bowlers2024 · 1 citations