PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 20240 citationsOpen Access

Multimaterial design strategies and microstructural characterization of stainless steel 316-Inconel 718 developed by wire-based Directed Energy Deposition

View Full Paper
JUJulia UreñaMÁMarta Álvarez-Leal

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract The combination of different material properties to face severe conditions has been always demanded by different industrial sectors. For instance, in gas turbine components, excellent mechanical properties at high temperatures and corrosive environments are required. Traditionally, this has been achieved by conventional manufacturing of multiple materials with several steps and joining processes. However, manufacturing the entire component within the same process by additive manufacturing and the combination of two different materials is presented as a potential via to explore. In this research, the additive manufacturing of stainless steel (SS316L) and Nickel-based Inconel superalloy (IN718) multimaterial through different design strategies approaches has been developed and investigated by wire-based Laser Directed Energy Deposition (DED) technology. Direct transition between materials was applied and three multimaterial sandwich structures (S1, S2 and S3) were designed and successfully manufactured. The microstructure obtained in the three different regions (IN718, IN718/SS316 and SS316) was evaluated in both XY and XZ build directions. Rockwell C hardness was measured along the cross-sections of all samples to compare the different properties of the three samples developed. Defective microstructural features like big porosity, cracks or lack-of-fusion at the SS316/IN718 interphases were not evidenced for S2 and S3 strategies. Multimaterial samples showed very fine microstructures corresponding to the DED processing, and secondary phases such as intermetallic-compounds or carbides were not found. Smooth transitions between materials were obtained which also led to a gradient in microstructure and hardness properties. S3 sample showed the highest hardness value, being the IN718 value even higher compared to conventional IN718 material.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ureña et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e664b1b6db6435875f0ec2https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4416707/v1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Influence of Orientation and Alloy Ratio on the Mechanical Performance of Directly Bonded Additively Manufactured SS316L/IN718 Bimetallic structures2026
  2. 2Design of dissimilar material joint for defect-free multi-material additive manufacturing via laser-directed energy deposition2024 · 8 citations
  3. 3Interface characteristics of selective laser melted stainless steel 316L and Inconel 7182024 · 4 citations
  4. 4Thermal modeling and microstructural evaluation of SS316L-IN718 single track deposits produced by directed energy deposition2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5Spatially Engineered Strength: Thermomechanical Notch Strengthening in Additively Manufactured 316L-IN7182026 · 1 citations