PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2024Scientific Reports22 citationsOpen Access

Effects of bone surface topography and chemistry on macrophage polarization

View Full Paper
BÖBirgün ÖzçolakBEBerkay ErenaySOSedat Odabaş

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Surface structure plays a crucial role in determining cell behavior on biomaterials, influencing cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation, as well as immune cells and macrophage polarization. While grooves and ridges stimulate M2 polarization and pits and bumps promote M1 polarization, these structures do not accurately mimic the real bone surface. Consequently, the impact of mimicking bone surface topography on macrophage polarization remains unknown. Understanding the synergistic sequential roles of M1 and M2 macrophages in osteoimmunomodulation is crucial for effective bone tissue engineering. Thus, exploring the impact of bone surface microstructure mimicking biomaterials on macrophage polarization is critical. In this study, we aimed to sequentially activate M1 and M2 macrophages using Poly- l -Lactic acid (PLA) membranes with bone surface topographical features mimicked through the soft lithography technique. To mimic the bone surface topography, a bovine femur was used as a model surface, and the membranes were further modified with collagen type-I and hydroxyapatite to mimic the bone surface microenvironment. To determine the effect of these biomaterials on macrophage polarization, we conducted experimental analysis that contained estimating cytokine release profiles and characterizing cell morphology. Our results demonstrated the potential of the hydroxyapatite-deposited bone surface-mimicked PLA membranes to trigger sequential and synergistic M1 and M2 macrophage polarizations, suggesting their ability to achieve osteoimmunomodulatory macrophage polarization for bone tissue engineering applications. Although further experimental studies are required to completely investigate the osteoimmunomodulatory effects of these biomaterials, our results provide valuable insights into the potential advantages of biomaterials that mimic the complex microenvironment of bone surfaces.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Özçolak et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e665f2b6db6435875f20a7https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-62484-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Surface characteristics of PLA and PLGA films2006 · 275 citations
  2. 2Collagen-derived peptide, DGEA, inhibits pro-inflammatory macrophages in biofunctional hydrogels2021 · 27 citations
  3. 3Bioceramic powders for bone regeneration modified by high-pressure CO2 process2020 · 8 citations
  4. 4Biomimetic mineralized strontium-doped hydroxyapatite on porous poly(L-lactic acid) scaffolds for bone defect repair2018 · 103 citations
  5. 5Combinatorial Surface Roughness Effects on Osteoclastogenesis and Osteogenesis2018 · 137 citations