PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 20240 citationsOpen Access

Imputation of Missing Photometric Data and Photometric Redshift Estimation for CSST

View Full Paper
ZLZhijian LuoZTZhirui TangZCZhu Chen

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Accurate photometric redshift (photo-z) estimation requires support from multi-band observational data. However, in the actual process of astronomical observations and data processing, some sources may have missing observational data in certain bands for various reasons. This could greatly affect the accuracy and reliability of photo-z estimation for these sources, and even render some estimation methods unusable. The same situation may exist for the upcoming Chinese Space Station Telescope (CSST). In this study, we employ a deep learning method called Generative Adversarial Imputation Networks (GAIN) to impute the missing photometric data in CSST, aiming to reduce the impact of data missing on photo-z estimation and improve estimation accuracy. Our results demonstrate that using the GAIN technique can effectively fill in the missing photometric data in CSST. Particularly, when the data missing rate is below 30\%, the imputation of photometric data exhibits high accuracy, with higher accuracy in the g, r, i, z, and y bands compared to the NUV and u bands. After filling in the missing values, the quality of photo-z estimation obtained by the widely used Easy and Accurate Zphot from Yale (EAZY) software is notably enhanced. Evaluation metrics for assessing the quality of photo-z estimation, including the catastrophic outlier fraction (f₎ₔₓ), the normalized median absolute deviation (₍₌₀₃), and the bias of photometric redshift (bias), all show some degree of improvement. Our research will help maximize the utilization of observational data and provide a new method for handling sample missing values for applications that require complete photometry data to produce results.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Luo et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e66845b6db6435875f46c4https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2406.01719
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Imputation of missing photometric data and photometric redshift estimation for CSST2024 · 14 citations
  2. 2Comparative analysis of missing data imputation methods for CSST survey: Impact on photometric redshift estimation performance2026
  3. 3Improving Photometric Redshift Estimates with Training Sample Augmentation2024 · 11 citations
  4. 4Improving Photometric Redshift Estimates with Training Sample Augmentation2024 · 2 citations
  5. 5Accurately Estimating Redshifts from CSST Slitless Spectroscopic Survey using Deep Learning2024