PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 20240 citationsOpen Access

Towards the Transferability of Rewards Recovered via Regularized Inverse Reinforcement Learning

View Full Paper
ASAndreas SchlaginhaufenMKMaryam Kamgarpour

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) aims to infer a reward from expert demonstrations, motivated by the idea that the reward, rather than the policy, is the most succinct and transferable description of a task Ng et al., 2000. However, the reward corresponding to an optimal policy is not unique, making it unclear if an IRL-learned reward is transferable to new transition laws in the sense that its optimal policy aligns with the optimal policy corresponding to the expert's true reward. Past work has addressed this problem only under the assumption of full access to the expert's policy, guaranteeing transferability when learning from two experts with the same reward but different transition laws that satisfy a specific rank condition Rolland et al., 2022. In this work, we show that the conditions developed under full access to the expert's policy cannot guarantee transferability in the more practical scenario where we have access only to demonstrations of the expert. Instead of a binary rank condition, we propose principal angles as a more refined measure of similarity and dissimilarity between transition laws. Based on this, we then establish two key results: 1) a sufficient condition for transferability to any transition laws when learning from at least two experts with sufficiently different transition laws, and 2) a sufficient condition for transferability to local changes in the transition law when learning from a single expert. Furthermore, we also provide a probably approximately correct (PAC) algorithm and an end-to-end analysis for learning transferable rewards from demonstrations of multiple experts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schlaginhaufen et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e66845b6db6435875f470chttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2406.01793
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Recent Advancements in Inverse Reinforcement Learning2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Generalizing Behavior via Inverse Reinforcement Learning with Closed-Form Reward Centroids2025
  3. 3Recovering Reward Functions From Distributed Expert Demonstrations via Bi-Level Maximum-Likelihood Optimization2026
  4. 4Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Non-Markovian Rewards2024
  5. 5Offline Inverse RL: New Solution Concepts and Provably Efficient Algorithms2024